Usually the people who write/say: „For the Earth“ mean – seeing the same Earth as we do: “let’s relativize and/or ignore the faunacide going on in agriculture, science labs, in hunts, arts and culture, for recreational purposes … legally, practically…WeiterlesenFor your Earth?
Schlagwort: Fragments
Fragment, draft Set theory: Democracy, the exclusion of Nonhumanity and the problematic shared space Democracy is the rule of the masses and majorities. It requires every day anew from you to be thankful for being able to voice your more…WeiterlesenDemocracy (1)
So Animal Ethics is okay. Are we ought to keep all the biologisms in Animal Sociology then too? For an antibiologistic, non-segregative and anti-hegemonial sociological approach to Nonhumanity. There is much talk about “Tierleid” (animal suffering) in German these days,…WeiterlesenSuffering Injustice
At the Margin in the Midst If you’re going to treat animal rights and its adjoining issues like topics that are on the fringe and require a lot of expertise to be discussed, what do you really think about environment,…WeiterlesenExperts and Perspectives
Species devaluation, speciesism: Intelligence plays a role, sentience plays a role, only these are pieces of a puzzle called life, where the standard for the evaluation of any characteristics of „life“ cannot not be a hegemonic one. Gruppe Messel previously:…WeiterlesenAnimal Objectification and Perspectives (1)
Tiergestützte Therapie: Nichtmenschen teilen ihren sozialen/sensiblen Reichtum. Niemand fragt danach, wie deren Traumata geheilt werden. Man nimmt die Beiträge, die Nichtmenschen für menschliche Gemeinschaften leisten, als selbstverständlich hin. Ohne reziprokes Interesse. Antispe, Gruppe MesselWeiterlesenTiertherapie für tierliche Traumata
Companion Animals in microsanctuary squats and insisting on the outraged mode This is a paradox: People choosing rhetorics to address speciesist-eating-behaviour by saying “what about you ate that other Nonhuman then?“ – the carnist approach in circumventing the bigger picture…WeiterlesenCompanion Animals in microsanctuary squats and insisting on the outraged mode
If you recognize that “voice“ is an idea that can find correspondence in our view about Nonhumanity, then referring back to biological end ethological ‘expertism’ ( > definitional sovereignty) to interpret nonhuman voices seems to be fully missing the point…WeiterlesenHuman and Nonhuman voices synergizing
„Der Mensch“ wird in dem Moment zum unsoziologisch „sozialen Monolith“, indem Zuschreibungen wichtiger sozialer und existenzieller Eigenschaften weiterhin, das tierliche Gegenüber in seiner Besonderheit reduzierend, biologisierend, schlussfolgernd und wertend segregieren. Feststellungen in Sachen: vollumfänglicher tierobjektifizierender KommunikationsmodiWeiterlesenFeststellungen (2)
Kategorien
Who kills who
It’s also a logic: if/as animals kill animals, humans can’t be radical animal rights activists, for instance. However nonhumans among themselves are one thing. How one sees humans and defines one’s humanness remains a point of contention, seen from all…WeiterlesenWho kills who