This fragment is contained in > https://farangis.de/reader/edition_farangis_animal_autonomy_reader_2023_1.pdf > Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 1 (2023) This fragment in German > https://tierrechtsethik.de/hauptsache-undifferenziert-bescheid-wissen/ Knowing things, while being undifferentiated The relegation of “ the main thing is being for the…WeiterlesenKnowing things, while being undifferentiated
Schlagwort: discoursive change
This fragment is contained in > https://farangis.de/reader/edition_farangis_animal_autonomy_reader_2023_1.pdf > Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 1 (2023) The fragment in German > https://tierrechtsethik.de/die-erfahrungsebene-gerecht-betrachten/ Looking in a fair way at the level of experience Some people who compare their problems…WeiterlesenLooking in a fair way at the level of experience
Usually the people who write/say: „For the Earth“ mean – seeing the same Earth as we do: “let’s relativize and/or ignore the faunacide going on in agriculture, science labs, in hunts, arts and culture, for recreational purposes … legally, practically…WeiterlesenFor your Earth?
So Animal Ethics is okay. Are we ought to keep all the biologisms in Animal Sociology then too? For an antibiologistic, non-segregative and anti-hegemonial sociological approach to Nonhumanity. There is much talk about “Tierleid” (animal suffering) in German these days,…WeiterlesenSuffering Injustice
Die altruistisch daherkommende Verfügungshoheit der Greenwashing-Technokratiefreunde lässt eine Kluft innerhalb sowohl der Umwelt- als auch der Tierverteidigendenbewegungen erkennbar werden. Auf der einen Seite herrscht die Konzeption, auf der anderen das grundsätzliche Neudenken. — The altruistic appearing authority claimers of the…WeiterlesenSe divide
If you recognize that “voice“ is an idea that can find correspondence in our view about Nonhumanity, then referring back to biological end ethological ‘expertism’ ( > definitional sovereignty) to interpret nonhuman voices seems to be fully missing the point…WeiterlesenHuman and Nonhuman voices synergizing
Kategorien
Who kills who
It’s also a logic: if/as animals kill animals, humans can’t be radical animal rights activists, for instance. However nonhumans among themselves are one thing. How one sees humans and defines one’s humanness remains a point of contention, seen from all…WeiterlesenWho kills who
Clashes in Wordviews. I was just gonna write about them, then I came across this very vivid example: Here we see a good example of clashing worldviews. If I add our view, we’d even have three differing positions. However the…WeiterlesenClashes in Worldviews (1)
Fragment in EN/DE/ES Specifics of animal objectification: the reification as … Some people tend to humiliate nonhumans by an addition of means of ridiculing and making conscious ‘fun’ of the wares/items/commodities/chattel that is physically being generated from the factual bodily…WeiterlesenSpecifics of animal objectification: the reification as … (en/de/es)
Specifics of Animal Objectification: Food, Physis, History [Rev. 27.02.23] Fragments: Specifics of speciesism Where intersections turn crossroads: shared factors of oppressive functions, separating markers. Seeing what makes each case unique might help putting the puzzles together. >> If you keep…WeiterlesenSpecifics of Animal Objectification: Food, Physis, History