What people in animal studies call animal history is usually the history of human disparagement of nonhumans. Analogisms for comparison in matters of human judgment of injustice/imperception of injustice would clarify the difference in perspective. Antibiologistic Animal Sociology, Gruppe MesselWeiterlesenPerspectivities: Animal Sociology and Animal History
Schlagwort: how interfaces will interact
“Animal Liberation – Human Liberation” say the ones who in the next three phrases make either clear that a.) circumstances generally weigh sensitively more when we / if we’d endure what “they” endure, vice versa is a totally different story and…WeiterlesenTotal Liberation and Total Obstacles
Nonsymbolic Animality. Not abstractly vague, not diffuse, not schematic, not stereotype, not antiindividualistic, not predetermined by anything but by the own inner source. Peers in mind (pain/reason … ). — Human Societies amongst Animal Societies. I don’t think that the…WeiterlesenHuman Societies amongst Animal Societies
Animal sociology as an interface between animal rights activists and animals When a statement such as the following relates to the human-animal relationship, it is only logical to both: 1.) To respect non-humans in their own sociology instead of forcing…WeiterlesenAnimal sociology as an interface between animal rights activists and animals.
Tiersoziologie als Schnittstelle zwischen Tierrechtler:innen und Tieren Wenn sich eine Aussage wie die folgende auf das Mensch-Tier-Verhältnis bezieht, so ist es nur logisch sowohl: 1.) Nichtmenschen statt in biologistische Rahmen zu zwängen in ihrer eigenen Soziologie zu respektieren 2.) Und…WeiterlesenTiersoziologie als Schnittstelle zwischen Tierrechtler:innen und Tieren
Infighting in what Human Rights issues? Talking about „Total Liberation“ while supporting drive-by media formats > anno 2023. It’s simply not enough these days to say: hey I’m a POC! If you side for instance with political groups that oppress…WeiterlesenWhy there is no thing such an „infighting“
Draft 11.08.2023 Relating to Nonhumans on a subjective level would mean for instance: In typical child psychology and childhood sociological terms, kids to relate positively to Nonhuman embodied characters in picture books with toys, etc. > see for a discussion…WeiterlesenHarming embodied subjectivtity
Sagen wird’s mal so, sowohl der ethisch-philosophische Freibrief zur Zerstörung von beidem: der ’natürlichen‘ Mitwelt als Ganzem, als auch spezifisch der Tierheit, beginnen schlüssigerweise im gleichen Zuge wie die Empfehlungen, beides zu vermeiden. Schlichtweg weil wir beides lediglich mit unserem…WeiterlesenAnthropogenic Philosophies (2)
Segregatives Denken in Bezug auf Geschichtsverständnis (animal sapiens/’oikos’/homos) und > Weltgeschichte > wo beginnt das philosophische Anthropozän und wo würde es enden, beides in philosophischer Hinsicht? ( + Verschiedene widersprüchliche Positionen sind Teil des Dilemmas.) — Segregative thinking in terms…WeiterlesenAnthropogenic Philosophies (1)
You talk about abstract „suffering“ instead of functioning injustice, and normalize the speech of „production“ of individuals, instead that of discussing faunacides, theriocides … as the causa. You want to talk objectively about things unobjective, but don’t notice that your…WeiterlesenNaming the Theriocides and Faunacides