If you recognize that “voice“ is an idea that can find correspondence in our view about Nonhumanity, then referring back to biological end ethological ‘expertism’ ( > definitional sovereignty) to interpret nonhuman voices seems to be fully missing the point of where our behavioral and perspectivical change should become a new reality and shape a new tone in “us”.

Gruppe Messel, Tiersoziologie


Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert