Speciesist objectifications: being considered edible Unique atrocity speciesism: Edibility in the case of the human-animal-relationship always goes along with the legitimization of “meat eating” via objectification of the animal body. The question should thus not be the distracting: “are we…WeiterlesenSpeciesist objectifications: being considered edible
Schlagwort: architectures of destructivities
The lesser credible allies Immer schauen, warum und wie Leute jemanden und eine Sache verteidigen oder für sie einzustehen meinen. Werden Motivationen dahinter als fragwürdig erkennbar, dann trenne a.) Themen stets von irgendwelchen Proponenten, und b.) kontextualisiere alles im Rahmen…WeiterlesenThe lesser credible allies
Followerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification “Hi, no infighting”, but a bunch of people rally for closing down animal shelters and bring this argument forth as their academic output from within Animal Rights + Animal Liberation scenes. You may…WeiterlesenFollowerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification
The relation between animal rights and environmental protection / protection of the co-world is not an illusionary niche realm, but rather the most conflict-prone place in which you can politically move as a ‚member of the species Homo sapiens‘. In…WeiterlesenThe Animal Rights Environmental Rights Link
Question everything … except hegemonic human rhetorics and everything that emboldens the necessary claims and assumptions needed here. Multi-Issued … cos Nonhumans are being literally isolated in those allround, all-encompassing wvs*, schemes and stratagems gruppe messel * worldviewsWeiterlesenCovert Instrumentalizing Speciesism
Critical Animal Studies activists and their harboring of antisemitic ideas While some Critical Animal Studies activists harboring antisemitic ideas others miss to distance themselves from such rhetorics. Is the Critical Animal Studies bubble aware that probably a huge part of…WeiterlesenCritical Animal Studies activists and their harboring of antisemitic ideas
The abbreviated view of Animal Rights is agenda driven Those agendas that suppose AR was intrinsically “single issue” as a topic in itself: Logically it will not work out if you seek to impose > your single agenda > onto…WeiterlesenThe abbreviated view of Animal Rights is agenda driven
Segregative approaches Repost from https://www.simorgh.de/objects/segregative-approaches/ Question about segregative approaches, such as found in the discussion here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csydct [accessed 12.10.2023], where conservationist approaches typically stand in conflict with the concepts of animal rights, for a large part by ignoring aspects affecting nonhuman life…WeiterlesenSegregative approaches
Kategorien
Could nonhuman pain ever equal a norm
Could nonhuman pain ever equal a norm Can Animal Friends critique Animal Objectification taking place in the medical field but also put forth the basic fundamental wrong in medical history overall? Who suggests that the reason that Animal Experimentation is…WeiterlesenCould nonhuman pain ever equal a norm
Nonhuman and human animal friends are confronted with a one-sided anthropogenic faunacidal war against nonhuman animality and animalness. This one-sided destruction war runs parallel to the ecocidal war, by which Homo sapiens denies the entire animality its natural habitat and…WeiterlesenFaunacide and Ecocide