Nonhuman and human animal friends are confronted with a one-sided anthropogenic faunacidal war against nonhuman animality and animalness. This one-sided destruction war runs parallel to the ecocidal war, by which Homo sapiens denies the entire animality its natural habitat and…WeiterlesenFaunacide and Ecocide
Schlagwort: architectures of destructivities
“Animal Liberation – Human Liberation” say the ones who in the next three phrases make either clear that a.) circumstances generally weigh sensitively more when we / if we’d endure what “they” endure, vice versa is a totally different story and…WeiterlesenTotal Liberation and Total Obstacles
Factory farming is the animal objectifying euphemism for the collectivistically sanctioned institutionalized factory killing as one of the main components of the ongoing faunacides. Humane farming is a euphemism for a normalized pastoral animal objectification – the ideological pillar on…WeiterlesenFactory Killings, Pastoral Killings
When people pretend to speak in the the voices of their companion animals. What’s going wrong there? Disenfranchisement. Where does the speaker/ventriloquist place him- or herself? People legitimate a lot of things with assuming they can be the subsitute thinkers…WeiterlesenHow people might reflect the others
Draft 11.08.2023 Relating to Nonhumans on a subjective level would mean for instance: In typical child psychology and childhood sociological terms, kids to relate positively to Nonhuman embodied characters in picture books with toys, etc. > see for a discussion…WeiterlesenHarming embodied subjectivtity
Segregatives Denken in Bezug auf Geschichtsverständnis (animal sapiens/’oikos’/homos) und > Weltgeschichte > wo beginnt das philosophische Anthropozän und wo würde es enden, beides in philosophischer Hinsicht? ( + Verschiedene widersprüchliche Positionen sind Teil des Dilemmas.) — Segregative thinking in terms…WeiterlesenAnthropogenic Philosophies (1)
You talk about abstract „suffering“ instead of functioning injustice, and normalize the speech of „production“ of individuals, instead that of discussing faunacides, theriocides … as the causa. You want to talk objectively about things unobjective, but don’t notice that your…WeiterlesenNaming the Theriocides and Faunacides
An deutschen Unis wird man bestimmt noch in 500 Jahren die Fragen klug und differenziert diskutieren, „ob“ Tiere Rechte haben „sollten“, und ob wir zugunsten ihrer Interessen entscheiden „sollten“. @tiersoziologie In 500 years, German universities will certainly still be discussing…WeiterlesenKaum Tierlichkeit in Academia (1)
Usually the people who write/say: „For the Earth“ mean – seeing the same Earth as we do: “let’s relativize and/or ignore the faunacide going on in agriculture, science labs, in hunts, arts and culture, for recreational purposes … legally, practically…WeiterlesenFor your Earth?
Clashes in Wordviews. I was just gonna write about them, then I came across this very vivid example: Here we see a good example of clashing worldviews. If I add our view, we’d even have three differing positions. However the…WeiterlesenClashes in Worldviews (1)