Ob Dachs oder Trans 1.) Zur Klärung Wird eine Tötung richtiger, wenn ein menschliches soziales Gefüge sie sanktioniert – außer in der Hinsicht, dass der Täter in dem Fall keine soziale Ächtung erfährt … Ist eine Tötung an sich der…WeiterlesenDeath Yards and Social Graveyards
Kategorie: animal objectifying normalcy in academia and the kulturindustrie
Das Problem in den HAS ist, nichts in ihren Eigenbegriffen verhindert ihre Proponenten von Aussagen, wie z.B., dass Hühner in der „Viehzucht“ arbeiteten (Unrecht und Folter seien kein Thema), oder, die gelernte Hilflosigkeit bleibt bestehen, nicht handfest und hundertprozentig klar…WeiterlesenThe utterly narrowminded Human Animal Studies
Followerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification “Hi, no infighting”, but a bunch of people rally for closing down animal shelters and bring this argument forth as their academic output from within Animal Rights + Animal Liberation scenes. You may…WeiterlesenFollowerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification
Fühlende Wesen sind vulnerable Wesen Animal Sapiens Antispe Sentient beings are vulnerable beings Animal Sapiens AntispeWeiterlesenSentience / Fühlen
Question everything … except hegemonic human rhetorics and everything that emboldens the necessary claims and assumptions needed here. Multi-Issued … cos Nonhumans are being literally isolated in those allround, all-encompassing wvs*, schemes and stratagems gruppe messel * worldviewsWeiterlesenCovert Instrumentalizing Speciesism
Im Speziesismus startet die physische Gewalt mit geistiger Brandstiftung. Kein „Spill-Over-Effekt“, der maßgeblich wäre, bei dem es sich dann anders herum verhielt (erst Gewalt, dann infolge dessen Verächtlichmachung von _____). Beides bewegt sich auf der geschaffenen Parallele. – via Wegegold…WeiterlesenParallelen
Segregative approaches Repost from https://www.simorgh.de/objects/segregative-approaches/ Question about segregative approaches, such as found in the discussion here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csydct [accessed 12.10.2023], where conservationist approaches typically stand in conflict with the concepts of animal rights, for a large part by ignoring aspects affecting nonhuman life…WeiterlesenSegregative approaches
One should look what a strange term „human ethics“ was if used as a description that would evade the actual reasoning by humans theselves. „Animal ethics“ is obviously being used in that way + it solely thinks of measurements of…WeiterlesenThe active and passive modes of ethics, seriously?
What people in animal studies call animal history is usually the history of human disparagement of nonhumans. Analogisms for comparison in matters of human judgment of injustice/imperception of injustice would clarify the difference in perspective. Antibiologistic Animal Sociology, Gruppe MesselWeiterlesenPerspectivities: Animal Sociology and Animal History
Nonhuman and human animal friends are confronted with a one-sided anthropogenic faunacidal war against nonhuman animality and animalness. This one-sided destruction war runs parallel to the ecocidal war, by which Homo sapiens denies the entire animality its natural habitat and…WeiterlesenFaunacide and Ecocide