One should look what a strange term „human ethics“ was if used as a description that would evade the actual reasoning by humans theselves. „Animal ethics“ is obviously being used in that way + it solely thinks of measurements of how human should behave and think about animals.
It’s the contentwise simplification of > being an animal and animality > in a perspectivical function for humans and solely their ethical conceptions regarding the nonhuman animals. Not one minute do humans permit nonhuman animals their own knowledge and their own wisdom.
Gruppe Messel