One should look what a strange term „human ethics“ was if used as a description that would evade the actual reasoning by humans theselves. „Animal ethics“ is obviously being used in that way + it solely thinks of measurements of how human should behave and think about animals.

It’s the contentwise simplification of > being an animal and animality > in a perspectivical function for humans and solely their ethical conceptions regarding the nonhuman animals. Not one minute do humans permit nonhuman animals their own knowledge and their own wisdom.

Gruppe Messel

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert