The red soil equalizer notes: Who cares about „what“ or even „who“ you people are: As long as the world is full of speciesism, you get speciesist actions in all imaginable and non-imaginable forms, on any level at any place…WeiterlesenEqualizer, poem (1)
Schlagwort: Antibiologism and Antispe
Followerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification “Hi, no infighting”, but a bunch of people rally for closing down animal shelters and bring this argument forth as their academic output from within Animal Rights + Animal Liberation scenes. You may…WeiterlesenFollowerism and no infighting against Animal Objectification
The relation between animal rights and environmental protection / protection of the co-world is not an illusionary niche realm, but rather the most conflict-prone place in which you can politically move as a ‚member of the species Homo sapiens‘. In…WeiterlesenThe Animal Rights Environmental Rights Link
Bildschriften, Vignetten von C. 勒 C. 勒 und Tschördy zur Anregung für Mitstreiter*innen zur Etablierung mehr digitaler inklusiver Werkräume um Aktivismus Ausdruck zu verleihen und die eigenen Rechte im gleichen Zuge stärker einzufordern. Wir schreiben nun unseren ersten gemeinsamen Beitrag über…WeiterlesenC. 勒 und Tschördy zur Anregung für Mitstreiter*innen
Insisting on our self-assumed and self-defined right as „individuals“ and „living beings“ to stand beyond all clusters, whether left or right. Our group is and remains predominantly happily detached from society. Positive reference > individuals! If left and right were…WeiterlesenAn antispe center of left and right?
The abbreviated view of Animal Rights is agenda driven Those agendas that suppose AR was intrinsically “single issue” as a topic in itself: Logically it will not work out if you seek to impose > your single agenda > onto…WeiterlesenThe abbreviated view of Animal Rights is agenda driven
Neudenken (1)
„Neudenken“ muss man eigentlich nur beim Antispeziesismus, aber dies auch nur, wenn man diesen in der weitestmöglichen Unabhängigkeit von den üblichen dominierenden Kategorisierungsmodellen denkt.WeiterlesenNeudenken (1)
Segregative approaches Repost from https://www.simorgh.de/objects/segregative-approaches/ Question about segregative approaches, such as found in the discussion here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csydct [accessed 12.10.2023], where conservationist approaches typically stand in conflict with the concepts of animal rights, for a large part by ignoring aspects affecting nonhuman life…WeiterlesenSegregative approaches
Could nonhuman pain ever equal a norm
Could nonhuman pain ever equal a norm Can Animal Friends critique Animal Objectification taking place in the medical field but also put forth the basic fundamental wrong in medical history overall? Who suggests that the reason that Animal Experimentation is…WeiterlesenCould nonhuman pain ever equal a norm
One should look what a strange term „human ethics“ was if used as a description that would evade the actual reasoning by humans theselves. „Animal ethics“ is obviously being used in that way + it solely thinks of measurements of…WeiterlesenThe active and passive modes of ethics, seriously?










