Usually the people who write/say: „For the Earth“ mean – seeing the same Earth as we do: “let’s relativize and/or ignore the faunacide going on in agriculture, science labs, in hunts, arts and culture, for recreational purposes … legally, practically…WeiterlesenFor your Earth?
Schlagwort: Antibiologism and Antispe
So Animal Ethics is okay. Are we ought to keep all the biologisms in Animal Sociology then too? For an antibiologistic, non-segregative and anti-hegemonial sociological approach to Nonhumanity. There is much talk about “Tierleid” (animal suffering) in German these days,…WeiterlesenSuffering Injustice
Species devaluation, speciesism: Intelligence plays a role, sentience plays a role, only these are pieces of a puzzle called life, where the standard for the evaluation of any characteristics of „life“ cannot not be a hegemonic one. Gruppe Messel previously:…WeiterlesenAnimal Objectification and Perspectives (1)
Die altruistisch daherkommende Verfügungshoheit der Greenwashing-Technokratiefreunde lässt eine Kluft innerhalb sowohl der Umwelt- als auch der Tierverteidigendenbewegungen erkennbar werden. Auf der einen Seite herrscht die Konzeption, auf der anderen das grundsätzliche Neudenken. — The altruistic appearing authority claimers of the…WeiterlesenSe divide
Companion Animals in microsanctuary squats and insisting on the outraged mode This is a paradox: People choosing rhetorics to address speciesist-eating-behaviour by saying “what about you ate that other Nonhuman then?“ – the carnist approach in circumventing the bigger picture…WeiterlesenCompanion Animals in microsanctuary squats and insisting on the outraged mode
If you recognize that “voice“ is an idea that can find correspondence in our view about Nonhumanity, then referring back to biological end ethological ‘expertism’ ( > definitional sovereignty) to interpret nonhuman voices seems to be fully missing the point…WeiterlesenHuman and Nonhuman voices synergizing
Kategorien
Who kills who
It’s also a logic: if/as animals kill animals, humans can’t be radical animal rights activists, for instance. However nonhumans among themselves are one thing. How one sees humans and defines one’s humanness remains a point of contention, seen from all…WeiterlesenWho kills who
Clashes in Wordviews. I was just gonna write about them, then I came across this very vivid example: Here we see a good example of clashing worldviews. If I add our view, we’d even have three differing positions. However the…WeiterlesenClashes in Worldviews (1)
Specifics of Animal Objectification: Food, Physis, History [Rev. 27.02.23] Fragments: Specifics of speciesism Where intersections turn crossroads: shared factors of oppressive functions, separating markers. Seeing what makes each case unique might help putting the puzzles together. >> If you keep…WeiterlesenSpecifics of Animal Objectification: Food, Physis, History
On an individual or the group level: every ‘one’ […] who communicates should be able to use their ways of communication, their ways to communicate. This must be valid for all cultural terrains. And we must acknowledge – in the…WeiterlesenCommunication Diversity