The cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons

Ethical segregation contains >
the cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons
Examples:
a.) sexism > falsely being equalled with > the normalcy of being non-metaphorically objectified designated as „non-thinking“.
b.) intersubjetivity (experiences) > versus > rejecting so called analogies

In simpler words:

People find it perfectly okay to compare meat, a murder product, with experiences of sexism, but freak out when you take intersubjective experiences of degradation seriously „Help, Faschist makes analogue comparisons!“ Cognitive dissonance and worse all around my friends.

Die kognitive Dissonanz selektiver Vergleiche > https://tierrechtsethik.de/die-kognitive-dissonanz-selektiver-vergleiche/

 

Eine Antwort auf „The cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons“

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert