The cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons

The cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons

Ethical segregation contains >
the cognitive dissonance of selective comparisons

Examples:

a.) sexism > falsely being equaled with > the normalcy of being non-metaphorically objectified designated as „non-thinking“.
b.) intersubjectivity (experiences) > versus > rejecting so called analogies

In simpler words:

People find it perfectly okay to compare meat, a product that involved animal murder, with experiences of sexism, but freak out when you take intersubjective experiences of degradation seriously „Help, Fascist makes analogue comparisons!“ As if such stances weren’t cognitively dissonant.

Die kognitive Dissonanz selektiver Vergleiche > https://tierrechtsethik.de/die-kognitive-dissonanz-selektiver-vergleiche/