Kategorien
animal sapiens Animal Sociology GM pamphlets

Draft: The Analogy, Comparison and Relation

Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 5, August 2023. Pamphlets: The Analogy, Comparison and Relation, https://d-nb.info/1299449379/34

The Analogy, Comparison and Relation

Pro: We need the analogue comparisons […] to approach subjective layers of perspective and things related.

Con: We cannot clarify certain crucial specifics of speciesism and/or animal objectification by means of comparisons though.

What we do see in the dispute about „analogies“ in any case are some expressions of human hegemonial claims on

– the grades of injustice and how they would and ought to weigh

– the categorization of „the human sphere“ and > on which levels we separate things from one another > how we encounter things in terms of the experience of human destructivity > how these experiences are seen as „different“ in terms of the implicit „kinds of degradation“ and of political and cultural reasons and classification of harm, violation, and most of all „injustice“ as a recognized scope.

Materials on the topic:

Menschenrechte und Tierrechte in Korrelation bringen, E-Reader: Gruppe Messel, Jahrgang 3, Heft 8, 2021; https://d-nb.info/1246675552/34

Gita Yegane Arani: Die zerstörende Gewalt. Der Überlaufeffekt oder die Einmaligkeit in der Vorkommnis von Gewalt? Zum Holokaust- und Genozidvergleich in der Tierrechtsdiskussion

Looking in a fair way at the level of experience, Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 1, 2023, p. 17 > https://dnb.info/1278400958/34

Animal Rights ABC: How can I assert my basic human rights to demand fundamental animal rights? Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 3, Nr. 2, 2022 > https://d-nb.info/1271492067/34

E-Reader: Gruppe Messel, Jahrgang 3, Nr. 1, 2021, Tierrechte und antibiologistische Tiersoziologie: Der Tierrechtsdiskurs kann nicht weniger komplex geführt werden, als Diskurse über Menschenrechte > https://dnb.info/1228920923/34

E-Reader: Gruppe Messel, Jahrgang 1, Nr. 5, 2018, S. 12. Analogievergleiche differenziert betrachten > https://d-nb.info/121083295X/34

Female-identified human individuals and speciesism, species-derogation, –negation -annihilation or the overlooked problem of “women” and anthropocentric-collectivist speciesism, Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 1, Nr. 4, 2018, p. 3 > https://d-nb.info/1210835746/34

Making Anti-Speciesism itself a subject (repost), in Animal Sapiens Antispe: Discussing Ethical Segregation in terms of Animal Sociology and Animal Objectification, Edition Farangis: Animal Autonomy E-Reader, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 6, 2023, p. 19. https://d-nb.info/1306052157/34

Animal Sociology is a critical approach to facts on the Homo sapiens supposing herself as existent while blurring out the Animal sapiens …

Antibiologistic Animal Sociology: Biologistic (seclusionist and hegemonial) reductionism marks the most typical discriminatory approach to Nonhumans today.

Antibiologistic Animal Sociology is a critical approach toward facts about Homo sapiens as a humanness that recognizes and asserts itself as existent in its perception, while this humanness in the same course, on the other hand, fades out the factuality of the existence of Animal sapiens’ animality … .

Eine Antwort auf „Draft: The Analogy, Comparison and Relation“

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert